Blog

Reviewing 2010 Picks of Morningstar and Motley Fool

Motley Fool knocks it out of the park +68%, Morningstar knocked out with -20%

With the new year just beginning, it is time to look back at the top 2010 picks made by the gurus. In previous posts I have discussed performance of the top picks for 2010 made by Fortune and Forbes. LikeAssets has also analyzed the performance of many other research and financial websites. Below I present a couple more examples – Morningstar’s Ultimate Stock Picking team and their top picks to consider for 2010, and Motley Fool’s Rick Aristotle Munarriz with 5 Stocks that Should Beat the Market in 2010.

LikeAssets measures performance relative to the appropriate benchmarks for each investment. If Munarriz from Motley Fool selects primarily small cap stocks (he did), he should beat the small cap indexes, not the S&P 500. LikeAssets tracks the appropriate benchmark for each investment, be it small cap, emerging markets, REITs, etc., so it is possible to better measure a stock picker’s performance.

Motley Fool’s Rick Aristotle Munarriz – 5 Stocks That Should Beat the Market in 2010

Beat? How about crushed the market. With a LikeAssets score of 68% over the benchmarks, and 3 out of 5 picks with returns of over 100%, Rick is at the top of the list in performance of 2010 picks. Here are some more details on his 2010 picks.

Picks and Benchmark Composition:

The picks were primarily small cap. One was an emerging market stock, Perfect World (PWRD), and another was a Large Cap Growth stock, Apple (AAPL).

Portfolio and Benchmark Performance:

The portfolio returned 99% vs a 31% return of the blended benchmarks, resulting in a LikeAssets score of +68%.

Picks – Returns and LikeAssets Scores:

Open Table (OPEN), Sirius (SIRI), and IMAX (IMAX) had returns of 166%/165%/141%, all outperforming their benchmarks by over 100%. The only loser, Perfect World (PWRD) was crushed, losing 46%, 69% below the emerging market index. Nobody’s perfect.

And the performance of Rick’s 5 picks for 2010 were no fluke. LikeAssets has been tracking over 200 of Rick’s stock picks and he has achieved a return of over 100% and an overall score of 43% – the margin over the LikeAssets benchmarks.

More information on this portfolio of picks made by Munarriz can be found here.

Morningstar’s Ultimate Stock Pickers’ Stocks to Consider in 2010

These stock picks by Morningstar’s Ultimate Stock-Pickers would have been good to consider, but not to buy. With a return of 1% and a LikeAssets score of -20%, investors would have been much better off in passive index benchmarks that track these picks. Below are more details on the picks.

Picks and Benchmark Composition:

The picks were primarily Large Cap with only 2 out of 10 tracking to Small Cap indexes.

Portfolio and Benchmark Performance:

The portfolio returned 1% vs a 21% return of the blended benchmarks resulting in a LikeAssets score of -20%.

Picks – Returns and LikeAssets Score:

Genzyme (GENZ), with a return of 49% was the only pick out of ten to beat its benchmark at all, in this case by 26%. Thermo Fisher (TMO) had a gain of 16%, but that was below the benchmark by 6%. The two biggest losers, Apollo Group (APOL) and ITT Educational (ESI), lost -31%/-30%, and had LikeAssets scores of -49%/-48% below the benchmarks.

Looking at the other 90+ picks made by the Ultimate Stock-Pickers at Morningstar we concluded that, to date, they have not offered investors the ultimate in good stock picking. LikeAssets has been tracking 90+ picks of the Ultimate Stock-Pickers since 2009 and they have achieved a return of +20% but this produced an overall LikeAssets score of -9%, the margin under the LikeAssets benchmarks.

More information on this portfolio of picks by Morningstar’s Ultimate Stock-Pickers can be found here.

LikeAssets will continue to track returns for Rick Munarriz and the Ultimate Stock-Pickers in 2011, as well as other research sites, bloggers and financial media picks.

You can better understand your portfolio’s returns and alpha with the LikeAssets application now available at the Seeking Alpha app store.

01.07.2011 Permalink

Tracking Fortune's Top Ten Stocks for 2011

Majority of Picks are Small Caps

On December 6th, Fortune Magazine published its top ten stock picks for 2011. The theme is growth, and the goal was to pick growth stocks with below-market multiples.

Fortune notes that the ten stocks “are expected to bolster their profits an average of 61% next year – vs 14% for the S&P – and yet they trade at an average of 12 times next year’s earnings, vs. 13 times for the S&P”.

But there is an issue with this comparison – only 3 of the picks are in the S&P 500 – the picks are primarily small caps and should be compared accordingly as Fortune promotes its efforts to beat the S&P 500.

LikeAssets is now tracking the picks, and the portfolio is currently +4% against the LikeAssets benchmark which includes a blend of small and large cap indexes. Here is how the picks were asset classified:

Continue to the full post…
01.06.2011 Permalink

Goldman's Picks - Reviewing Performance of 2010 Software Sector Picks

Whipped the benchmark with a LikeAssets score of 31

There are a lot of analysts now making their calls for 2011 investments. Last December Larry Dignan did a brief mention of Goldman Sach’s Software Sector picks for 2010. How did the Goldman picks pan out?

LikeAssets allows me to analyze how the picks did against their appropriate asset class benchmark, as well as an industry benchmark. I’ll be looking at this as I consider the Goldman picks for 2011.

Goldman’s 2010 Software Sector Performance Review

Goldman’s highlighted three primary themes driving their Software Sector investment picks: (1) PC and Server upgrade cycle; (2) Virtual desktop and growth of the cloud; and (3) M&A activity would step up.

Here are the picks (% allocation started equally weighted in 12/14/2010) and the associated asset allocation used for determining the LikeAssets benchmark:

Continue to the full post…
12.22.2010 Permalink

A Review of 2010 Investment Guide Picks – Fortune vs Forbes

The score is Fortune 7, Forbes -5

It’s year end again, the holidays are upon us and so are the 2011 investment guides created by every one of the major financial media players. Before you look at their 2011 picks, let’s look at LikeAssets’ analysis of the picks from the 2010 investment guides. Not only did we calculate the returns, but LikeAssets calculated the alpha by using the appropriate benchmark for each investment selected. This post examines the performance of the picks in the 2010 investment guide issues put forth by Forbes and Fortune. The analysis assumes an investment of $1000 in each pick made when the articles became available on the web in late 2009.

It is interesting to note that while the ratio of losing picks/total picks was similar for both (Fortune 24%, Forbes 29%), there was a large gap in performance and alpha. With Forbes you got more winners than losers but overall, but you still would have been better off in passive index funds that tracked the Forbes picks. Here is how the picks were asset classified…

Continue to the full post…
12.15.2010 Permalink

Safety in Dividends?

Where should investors look for income when traditional sources yield so little, or nothing at all? Dividend stocks have been cast as an alternative, but many investors remain nervous about fulfilling fixed income allocations with stocks, and rightfully so. With that in mind I set out to see what dividend yields I can receive while playing it safe. For me safe means a low probability of near-term dividend cuts, the ability to maintain or grow the dividend whether the economic scenario is deflation or inflation, and a stock price that is a bargain.

Dividend Cuts: Interest Coverage helps investors understand a company’s ongoing earning power and cash flow and measures the ability to adequately cover interest payments on debt. If Interest Coverage is tight (for me anything under 6X), the dividend may be at risk if there is a bump in the road. To play it safe, I wanted at least a 10X coverage level giving me comfort that a dividend cut is not likely near-term. For additional analysis beyond the screener, consider looking at the full debt service coverage (which includes scheduled principal payments as well as interest) and the mix of fixed and floating rate debt. A higher level of fixed rate debt means that future interest payments should be less likely to spike if interest rates jump.

Continue to the full post…
11.18.2010 Permalink
1 3 5 6 7 8